Showing 1 - 10 of 57
In this paper, we address empirically the issue how unfair match between colleges and students would affect the long-run efficiency of the college admission system, measured by total wage level among college graduates. Using data from China College Student Survey, we find that unfair match tends...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012961869
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009632243
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010481217
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011788449
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011655017
In a school choice mechanism, school priorities are often based on student exam scores, by which student true ability may not be perfectly revealed. An ex-post fair matching mechanism (for example, Serial Dictatorship) can be undesirable in that it is not ex-ante fair: it may not match students...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012970309
We investigate the relative merits of the Boston and Serial Dictatorship mechanisms when the timing of students' preference submission over schools varies within the structure of the mechanism. Despite the well-documented disadvantages of the Boston mechanism (Abdulkadiroglu and Sonmez, 2003),...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012971334
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012430689
In a college admission mechanism, students are often matched with colleges by using a noisy signal of their true abilities (e.g., their exam scores). The matching outcome thus may be imperfect in terms of ex-ante fairness, which suggests matching students with higher ability to better colleges....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014264913
In a college admission mechanism, students are often matched with colleges by using a noisy signal of their true abilities (e.g., their exam scores). The matching outcome thus may be imperfect in terms of ex-ante fairness, which suggests matching students with higher ability to better colleges....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014226646