Showing 1 - 10 of 75,956
We investigate the role of Relative Performance Evaluation (RPE) theory in CEO pay and turnover using a product similarity-based definition of peers (Hoberg and Phillips 2016). RPE predicts that firms filter out common shocks (i.e., those affecting the firm and its peers) while evaluating CEO...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011807920
In assessing the performance of the CEO, subjectivity by the board of directors is often present in one form or another. We specifically focus on: (1) the ex ante option to ex post override a formula-based contract (“discretionary bonus”), and (2) the ex ante absence of any formula in a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013123718
Our paper contributes to the literature on executive successors other than the CEO by adding empirical evidence for CFO succession. We propose that the selection of outside successors may be contingent on the succession context and on the type of managerial role. We postulate that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013074548
In the empirical estimation of the relation between CEO pay and both firm and peer performance, researchers typically include conventional accounting-based measures that reflect firm performance net of executive pay expense. We analytically show that when firms evaluate CEO performance relative...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013218451
I study the consequences of a random exposure to common risk for the purpose of relative performance evaluation (RPE) and find that it significantly affects the usefulness and the empirical measurement of RPE. According to my analysis, the magnitude of the exposure risk not only determines how...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013006074
In many organizational contexts, managers might have self-serving incentives whereby giving high evaluations to … employees comes at the expense of their own payoff. In this study, I examine the impact of managers’ self-serving incentives on … the collection and use of information for the purpose of subjective performance evaluation. I find that managers with self …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013252250
, with data collected from annual reports and from 103 top managers from a wide range of Finnish business unit headquarters …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014212071
to the strategic objectives of a business unit, tend to be ignored by managers when making performance evaluation …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014114112
2001). Lipe and Salterio (2000) find that managers ignore one of the key scorecard features, the inclusion of measures that … process accountability (i.e., requiring managers to justify to their superior their performance evaluations) and/or improving … balanced scorecard) increases managers' usage of unique performance measures in their evaluations. Results suggest that either …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014072269
Firm performance is a crucial factor in how CEOs are evaluated. However, a CEO can be repeatedly lucky or unlucky, adding noise to performance outcomes as a measure of managerial ability. In this study, I examine how much of the observed cross-sectional dispersion in outcomes can be attributed...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014349424