Showing 1 - 4 of 4
The over/underconfidence behavior has been explained as a bias of the cognitive process in the decision maker. Such bias has been mainly justified by the difficulty of the task or the problem to decide upon. It’s the so called 'hard-easy effect' (Lichtenstein and Fischhoff, 1977). In this...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014204693
Contemporary works, such as Lusk & Hudson's (2004), find that the greater knowledge regarding the possible results of the ultimatum game lead to results closer to the subgame perfect equilibrium. In this paper we seek to further this line of research beyond the fact of making the individuals...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014026883
The present paper analyzes the dynamics of bargaining of the ultimatum game in presence of social differences amidst the participants. To that end, two parallel experiments were set-up. One where the social status states of the individuals were of common knowledge (alternative version) and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014026906
Social norms in ultimatum's game establish that extremely unequal offers lead to an inevitable failure. However, even under the obedience of the norm and far from Nash Equilibrium, negotiated wealth is traditionally favorable for proposers when information given is temporally incomplete. In our...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014209875