Showing 1 - 10 of 190,562
This article presents identification results for the marginal treatment effect (MTE) when there is sample selection. We show that the MTE is partially identified for individuals who are always observed regardless of treatment, and derive uniformly sharp bounds on this parameter under three...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012549438
This paper partially identifies population treatment effects in observational data under sample selection, without the benefit of random treatment assignment. Bounds are provided for both average and quantile population treatment effects, combining assumptions for the selected and the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011992007
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009737330
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011642886
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011897655
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014505133
This article presents identification results for the marginal treatment effect (MTE) when there is sample selection. We show that the MTE is partially identified for individuals who are always observed regardless of treatment, and derive uniformly sharp bounds on this parameter under four...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012848558
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010359445
This paper identifies sharp bounds on the mean treatment response and average treatment effect under the assumptions of both the concave-monotone treatment response (concave-MTR) and the monotone treatment selection (MTS). We use our bounds and the U.S. National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011757195
This paper proposes a test for missing at random (MAR). The MAR assumption is shown to be testable given instrumental variables which are independent of response given potential outcomes. A nonparametric testing procedure based on integrated squared distance is proposed. The statistic’s...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010503886