Showing 1 - 10 of 67
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011574373
This paper reviews the cost-benefit analysis, or “regulatory impact analysis” (RIA), in US bank regulators’ risk-based capital (RBC) rule proposals. We review the principles of cost-benefit analysis and its application by US bank regulators. We provide a brief background on RBC rules and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012417012
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013273240
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013274616
This paper reviews the cost-benefit analysis, or 'regulatory impact analysis' (RIA), in US bank regulators' risk-based capital (RBC) rule proposals. We review the principles of cost-benefit analysis and its application by US bank regulators. We provide a brief background on RBC rules and review...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012611582
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012536128
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012085319
This paper finds that U.S. economic performance has not generally improved under the Federal Reserve, with the possible exception of the Great Moderation. We analyze the Fed and pre-Fed periods in terms of the rates and volatilities of inflation and real GDP growth. Comparing the pre-Fed periods...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011194170
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010936769
Purpose – The purpose of this study is to replicate Avery and Berger’s (1991) analysis using data from 2001 through 2011. Although risk-based capital (RBC) regulation is a key component of US banking regulation, empirical evidence of the effectiveness of these regulations has been mixed....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014870642