Showing 1 - 10 of 295
Recent studies suggest that the conditional CAPM might hold, period-by-period, and that time-varying betas can explain the failures of the simple, unconditional CAPM. We argue, however, that significant departures from the unconditional CAPM would require implausibly large time-variation in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005750661
It has become standard practice in the cross-sectional asset pricing literature to evaluate models based on how well they explain average returns on size-B/M portfolios, something many models seem to do remarkably well. In this paper, we review and critique the empirical methods used in the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008488749
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005478153
It has become standard practice in the cross-sectional asset-pricing literature to evaluate models based on how well they explain average returns on size- and B/M-sorted portfolios, something many models seem to do remarkably well. In this paper, we review and critique the empirical methods used...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005580089
Recent studies suggest that the conditional CAPM might hold, period-by-period, and that time-varying betas can explain the failures of the simple, unconditional CAPM. We argue, however, that significant departures from the unconditional CAPM would require implausibly large time-variation in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005088994
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003979139
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003387865
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003355307
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10006967183
It has become standard practice in the cross-sectional asset-pricing literature to evaluate models based on how well they explain average returns on size- and B/M-sorted portfolios, something many models seem to do remarkably well. In this paper, we review and critique the empirical methods used...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012760823