Showing 1 - 8 of 8
We replicate three pricing tasks of Gneezy, List and Wu (2006) for which they document the so called uncertainty effect, namely that people value a binary lottery over non-monetary outcomes less than other people value the lottery's worse outcome. Unlike the authors who implement a verbal...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010276455
We replicate three pricing tasks of Gneezy, List and Wu (2006) for which they document the so called uncertainty effect, namely that people value a binary lottery over non-monetary outcomes less than other people value the lottery's worse outcome. Unlike the authors who implement a verbal...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003803120
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003903661
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003914722
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003950947
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003953601
Plott, Wit & Yang (2003) conduct a betting market experiment and find: First, information was aggregated. This suggests that traders updated their private information based on observed market odds. Second, a model based only on the use of private information seems to fit their data best. The...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013153388
We replicate three pricing tasks of Gneezy, List and Wu (2006) for which they document the so-called uncertainty effect, namely, that people value a binary lottery over non-monetary outcomes less than other people value the lottery's worse outcome. While the authors implemented a verbal lottery...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013157185