Showing 1 - 10 of 78
In this paper, we compare First Call analyst forecasts to unofficial forecasts of quarterly earnings per share commonly referred to as whisper forecasts. Our analysis yields the following results. First, we find that whispers are, on average, more accurate than First Call forecasts and are...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012710634
The purpose of the paper is to compare unofficial forecasts of earnings known as quot;whispersquot; to forecasts generated by First Call analysts. Our sample consists of approximately 900 whispers found primarily on message boards on investor web sites between 1995 and 1997. Our analysis yields...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012752917
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005673966
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005808853
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003014353
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003090540
Abstract, Part I: This paper uses periods of unusually heavy earnings estimate revision activity by analysts to assess the relative usefulness of corporate information events (CIEs) in firm valuation. Because accounting information is more readily available, newsworthy and accessible, we...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012737368
In Part I of this study, we evaluated the relative usefulness of information in alternative corporate information events (CIEs) to analysts by examining the frequency with which they trigger clusters of analysts' earnings estimate revisions. In Part II, we examine investor response to various...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012784480
This paper uses periods of unusually heavy earnings estimate revision activity by analysts to assess the relative usefulness of corporate information events (CIEs) in firm valuation. Because accounting information is more readily available, newsworthy and accessible, we hypothesize that CIEs...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012784483
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001119347