Showing 1 - 10 of 951
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002232594
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001757576
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001830139
The effectiveness of relative performance evaluation schemes, such as yardstick competition, can be undermined by collusion. The degree to which the regulated agents manage to collude will be affected by the particulars of the scheme. We hypothesize that in a repeated game setting schemes will...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014029205
When truth conflicts with efficiency, can verbal communication destroy efficiency? Or are lies or vagueness used to hide inconvenient truths? We consider a sequential 2-player public good game in which the leader has private information about the value of the public good. This value can be low,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009249698
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010176917
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009290352
We compare signaling by words and actions in a one-shot 2-person public good game with private information. The informed player, who knows the exact return from contributing, can signal by contributing first (actions) or by sending a costless message (words). Words can be about the return or...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011092715
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011093115
The effectiveness of relative performance evaluation schemes, such as yardstick competition, can be undermined by collusion.The degree to which the regulated agents manage to collude will be affected by the particulars of the scheme.We hypothesize that in a repeated game setting schemes will be...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011091230