Showing 1 - 10 of 834
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001762177
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013432563
This paper investigates (i) the robustness of hindsight bias in experimental asset markets, (ii) the time invariance of the different experimental risk elicitation methods of certainty equivalents and binary lottery choices, and (iii) their correspondence. The results of our within-subjects...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012712168
The results of an asset market experiment, in which 64 subjects trade two assets oneight markets in a computerized continuous double auction, indicate that objectivelyirrelevant information influences trading behavior. Moreover, positively and negativelyframed information leads to a particular...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005866816
Dynamics of compliance, depending on audit probability, sanctions, and the time lagbetween audits, are investigated in a tax experiment. Compliance varied significantlyover time: it decreased immediately after an audit and increased afterwards, especially if audits were frequent and sanctions high.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005866915
In diesem Arbeitspapier werden ökonomische und psychologische Forschungsergebnisse zur Steuermoral und Steuerhinterziehung diskutiert.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005867040
We experimentally investigate whether individuals can reliably detect cooperators in an anonymous decision environment by allowing participants to condition their choices in an asymmetric prisoner's dilemma and a trust game (i) on their partner's donation share to a self-selected charity, and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005867074
This paper investigates the robustness of hindsight bias in experimental asset markets, the time invariance of the different experimental risk elicitation methods of certainty equivalents and binary lottery choices, and their correspondence.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005850581
A vast literature shows that individuals frequently violate normative principles in reasoning. In evaluatingthe relevance of these findings for psychology, economics, and related disciplines, it is natural to askwhether reasoning errors reflect random aberrations or systematic biases. One...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005866768
A vast literature shows that individuals frequently fail to identify the normative solutionsin logical reasoning tasks. Much attention has been devoted to the study ofthese deviations at the individual level; less effort was exerted to investigate whetherinstitutional settings might facilitate...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005866977