Showing 1 - 9 of 9
This paper analyzes the empirical performance of two alternative ways in which multi-factor models with time-varying risk exposures and premia may be estimated. The first method echoes the seminal two-pass approach advocated by Fama and MacBeth (1973). The second approach is based on a Bayesian...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010409453
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002398866
This paper analyzes the empirical performance of two alternative ways in which multi-factor models with time-varying risk exposures and premia may be estimated. The first method echoes the seminal two-pass approach advocated by Fama and MacBeth (1973). The second approach is based on a Bayesian...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009411466
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003320649
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003298584
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003163904
"We analyze the volatility surface vs. moneyness and time to expiration implied by MIBO options written on the MIB30, the most important Italian stock index. We specify and fit a number of models of the implied volatility surface and find that it has a rich and interesting structure that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002917585
This paper analyzes the empirical performance of two alternative ways in which multi-factor models with time-varying risk exposures and premia may be estimated. The first method echoes the seminal two-pass approach advocated by Fama and MacBeth (1973). The second approach is based on a Bayesian...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013112877
This paper analyzes the empirical performance of two alternative ways in which multi-factor models with time-varying risk exposures and premia may be estimated. The first method echoes the seminal two-pass approach advocated by Fama and MacBeth (1973). The second approach extends previous work...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013131287