Showing 1 - 10 of 88
Randomised controlled or clinical trials (RCTs) are generally viewed as the most reliable method to draw causal inference as to the effects of a treatment, as they should guarantee that the individuals being compared differ only in terms of their exposure to the treatment of interest. This...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011580011
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011818368
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001700073
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001628695
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001633197
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001643566
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002017706
We highlight the importance of randomisation bias, a situation where the process of participation in a social experiment has been affected by randomisation per se. We illustrate how this has happened in the case of the UK Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA) experiment, in which over one...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009769298
One of the most powerful critiques of the use of randomised experiments in the social sciences is the possibility that individuals might react to the randomisation itself, thereby rendering the causal inference from the experiment irrelevant for policy purposes. In this paper we set out a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010356798
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003721446