Showing 1 - 10 of 35
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001218982
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001224467
Prior research has used inaccurate classification rules to distinguish between stock splits and stock dividends. For a sample of two-for-one stock distributions, we show that firms that accounted for the distribution as a stock dividend generated five-day abnormal returns of 2.70%, compared to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012789477
Stock dividends involving an increase in outstanding shares of less than 25% require a transfer from retained earnings of the market value of the new shares issued, a much larger transfer than the par value transferred for stock dividends of 25% or more. The choice of a distribution factor near...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012789490
We observe significant post-split excess returns of 7.93% in the first year and 12.15% in the first three years for a sample of 1,275 two-for-one stock splits. These excess returns follow an announcement return of 3.38%, indicating that the market underreacts to split announcements. The evidence...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012791152
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10006702921
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10006706307
Prior research has used inaccurate classification rules to distinguish between stock splits and stock dividends. The CRSP classification of two-for-one stock distributions agrees with the actual accounting treatment only 23% of the time. In addition, the accounting treatment impacts the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005609729
We observe significant post-split excess returns of 7.93 percent in the first year and 12.15 percent in the first three years for a sample of 1,275 two-for-one stock splits. These excess returns follow an announcement return of 3.38 percent, indicating that the market underreacts to split...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005609766
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001173224