Showing 11 - 20 of 29
In this article we use laboratory experiments to investigate (i) consumer acceptance of genetically modified (GM) foods in Germany, (ii) the effect of neutral information on consumer acceptance, and (iii) the existence and the extent of a hypothetical bias. Participants in our sample generally...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005005411
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005503069
This article contributes to the ongoing discussion about the impact of different labeling practices on the quality of genetically modified (GM) food products as perceived by the consumer. Thus far, many studies have adopted a stated preferences approach, finding that consumers have different...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005476812
This study applies a real option approach to quantify, ex-ante, the maximum incremental social tolerable irreversible costs that would justify immediate adoption of Bt maize in France. Based on field trials, we find that incremental private reversible benefits in the agricultural sector are -18...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005476863
In this paper we empirically assess and compare the environmental impact of pesticide programs for Bt, Ht (glufosinate) and conventional corn in Europe, employing the Environmental Impact Quotient. We use field trial data from Narbons, France 2004 as well as secondary data. Our results show that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005483988
Opponents of the voluntary labeling scheme for genetically modified (GM) food products often argue that consumers have the ?right to know? and therefore advocate mandatory labeling. In this paper we argue against this line of reasoning. Using experimental auctions conducted with a sample of the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005097865
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003843402
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008906316
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009010545
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009260857