Showing 1 - 8 of 8
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001737128
This note looks at the quality of the information on family income that selective colleges rely on to increase equality of opportunity by recruiting high-ability, low-income students. Individual family income estimates embedded in the College Board’s search parameters are compared, for 635...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003806744
This paper was prepared as a chapter for College Decisions: How Students Actually Make Them and How They Could, edited by Caroline Hoxby for publication by the University of Chicago Press for the NBER. In this chapter, we describe the potential significance of student peer effects for the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001767537
Two studies explored the experience and performance of students at Williams College in three-person groups that were homogeneous or heterogeneous in rated academic ability. In accord with hypotheses from Festinger’s (1954) social comparison theory, students in academically homogeneous groups...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003806741
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003945605
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000771263
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003854391
With only a small number of their students coming from families with the lowest incomes (10% from the bottom two family income quintiles), the nation's most selective private colleges and universities need to know why. Two ready ideological answers are (1) that low-income high-ability students...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003806734