Showing 1 - 10 of 31,192
This paper compares the extent of common ownership in the US and the EU stock markets, with a particular focus on differences in the applicable ownership transparency requirements. Most empirical research on common ownership to date has focused on US issuers, largely relying on ownership data...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013333571
Two recent reviews of Part IV of the Trade Practices Act (Cth) (1974) have looked specifically at the operation of Section 46 of this Act and come to very different conclusions concerning its efficacy. The Dawson review (2003) argued that no change to s46 was required as the courts were...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10004997879
It has been suggested that mergers, by increasing concentration, raise incentives to invest and hence are pro-competitive. To study the effects of mergers, we rewrite a game with simultaneous price and cost-reducing investment choices as one where firms only choose prices, and make use of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011853332
Human brain has invented the Computer&upgraded it to a level of Combrains. With Artificial Chemical Memory, these may grow to function as independent Iintellects, Master/Sponsor representatives and self- decision workers with autonomy&supreme capability. Like any human society learn and function...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005118844
Horizontal shareholding exists when significant shareholders have stock in horizontal competitors. (It is often imprecisely called "common shareholding," but that term can also apply when shareholders own stock in two noncompeting corporations. It differs from "cross-shareholding," which...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011685455
It has been suggested that mergers, by increasing concentration, raise incentives to invest and hence are pro-competitive. To study the effects of mergers, we rewrite a game with simultaneous price and cost-reducing investment choices as one where firms only choose prices, and make use of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011798644
This Article shows that new economic proofs and empirical evidence provide powerful confirmation that, even when horizontal shareholders individually have minority stakes, horizontal shareholding in concentrated markets often has anticompetitive effects. The new economic proofs show that,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011810808
Empirical evidence that horizontal shareholding has created anticompetitive effects in airline and banking markets have produced calls for antitrust enforcement. In response, others have critiqued the airline and banking studies and argued that antitrust law cannot tackle any anticompetitive...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011972909
At the heart of corporate governance are fundamental doctrines that limit court scrutiny of fiduciary and stockholder decisions: the business judgment rule limits scrutiny of informed director decisions and, as with Corwin cleansing, informed voting by “disinterested” shareholders is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014349324
An intense academic debate has arisen recently concerning the crucial quot;bedrockquot; that underpins a corporate governance regime where widely-held public companies dominate. In the discourse, little has been said about the contribution of merger activity. The paper seeks to address this gap...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012717848