Showing 1 - 10 of 15
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010921226
Johannesson et al.(1996) conjecture that in a coercive, uniform tax setting like dichotomous choice contingent valuation, willingness to pay for public programs would be affected by altruistic consideration of the costs imposed on others. Using a voting-BDM elicitation mechanism, we demonstrate...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005806713
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009653847
In this working paper we demonstrate that some of the statistical tests used by Huang and Smith in a recent Land Economics article (74(2 1998): 186-202) were erroneous, and raise concerns about their corresponding conclusions. Specifically, using data from one of the studies that they showcase,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010882461
Two methods for calibrating discrete choice contingent valuation responses – the dichotomous choice with followup certainty question method of Champ et al. (1997) and the multiple bounded method of Welsh and Poe (1998) – are evaluated using data from a field validity comparison of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010921184
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010921227
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010921233
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010921237
Can hypothetical questions reveal true values? An examination of the laboratory experimental literature examining contingent valuation (CV) lends some support for using open ended hypothetical willingness to pay questions. However, experimental studies examining dichotomous choice have found...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010921252
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010921312