Showing 1 - 10 of 316
Employers who use temporary agency staff in contrast to regular staff are not affected byemployment protection regulations when terminating a job. Therefore, services providedby temporary work agencies may be seen as a substitute for regular employment. In thispaper, we analyze the effects of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005866162
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000050725
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000386412
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000912533
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000871595
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000580124
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000889633
Laws on hiring and firing are intended to protect workers from unfair behavior by employers, to counter imperfections in financial markets that limit workers' ability to insure themselves against job loss, and to preserve firm-specific human capital. But by imposing costs on firms' adaptation to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011413798
Employment protection legislation aims to shield employees against unfair dismissal and earning reductions at the time of job loss. Theory suggests that employment protection stabilizes employment over cyclical upturns and downturns without necessarily increasing general unemployment. However,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011417401
Using Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC) data for 21 countries, I study the impact of employment protection laws (EPL) on job content. Economic theories predict that stricter protection increases workers' willingness to make firm-specific investments. These...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011480760