Showing 51 - 60 of 79,509
We study whether outside directors are held accountable for poor monitoring of executive compensation by examining the reputation penalties to directors of firms involved in the option backdating (BD) scandal of 2006–2007. We find that, at firms involved in BD, significant penalties accrued to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010576094
the announcement of a clawback adoption, as well as post-adoption stock and accounting performance, are significantly and …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012107693
If overstatements were a symptom of the agency conflict, pay-for-performance sensitivities should have increased in …, we show that (i) CEO pay-for-performance sensitivities are higher among firms whose shareholders stand to benefit from … overstatements; (ii) this cross-sectional relationship weakens significantly after SOX; and (iii) the within-firm decrease in pay-for-performance …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014204131
performance of a firm and change in the equivalent shares awarded to the CEO. That is exactly what we document in our sample of 21 …, that such a practice penalizes the sensitivity of CEO wealth to stock price performance as poor (superior) stock price … performance is rewarded (penalized) with larger (smaller) equity grants. Directors’ equity compensation also strongly reflects the …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014351180
This study examines whether Chief Executive Officer (CEO) equity-based holdings and compensation provide incentives to manipulate accounting reports. While several prior studies have examined this important question, the empirical evidence is mixed and the existence of a link between CEO equity...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012755181
This study examines how the use of option-based compensation for directors affects their independence in their decisions on CEOs' option-grant dates. Firms typically grant CEOs at-the-money options, i.e., with the strike price set equal to the grant-day stock price. This practice creates a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012736707
This paper examines the issues and controversies over the question of whether executive stock options should be expensed and, if so, how option values should be determined. It identifies and clarifies the key questions and surveys and synthesizes the academic and trade literature. Illustrations...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012737947
This study examines equity risk incentives as one determinant of corporate tax aggressiveness. Prior research finds that equity risk incentives motivate managers to make risky investment and financing decisions, since risky activities increase stock return volatility and the value of stock...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012751004
This study investigates whether firm innovation can be systematically traced to the CEO's performance evaluation made … by boards of directors. In evaluating CEO performance, the board can (i) assess and evaluate performance on job aspects … sensitive details. In this paper, I argue that these features of CEO performance evaluation are central to understanding how …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012708709
to firm performance. The study shows that executive pay and CEO incentives are lower in State controlled firms and firms … directors on the board have a higher pay-for-performance link. Non-State (private) controlled firms and firms with more … independent directors on the board are more likely to replace the CEO for poor performance. Finally, we document that US executive …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012708743