Showing 1 - 10 of 125
We confront a representative sample of 1102 Dutch individuals with a series of incentivized investment decisions and also elicit their time preferences. There are two treatments that differ in the frequency at which individuals decide about the invested amount. The low frequency treatment...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011048224
We confront a representative sample of one 1,102 Dutch individuals with a series of incentivized investment decisions and also elicit their time preferences. There are two treatments that differ in the frequency at which individuals decide about the invested amount. The low frequency treatment...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011271980
We confront a representative sample of one 1,102 Dutch individuals with a series of incentivized investment decisions and also elicit their time preferences. There are two treatments that differ in the frequency at which individuals decide about the invested amount. The low frequency treatment...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010291450
. -- framing ; choice under risk ; time preference ; experiment …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009681527
We confront a representative sample of one 1,102 Dutch individuals with a series of incentivized investment decisions and also elicit their time preferences. There are two treatments that differ in the frequency at which individuals decide about the invested amount. The low frequency treatment...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013089008
exists a utility function that the choices maximize. We conduct a large-scale field experiment that enables us to test …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008839445
We elicit time preferences of a representative sample of 1,102 Dutch individuals and also confront them with a series of incentivized investment decisions. There are two treatments which differ by the frequency at which individuals decide about the invested amount. The low frequency treatment...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013119938
presence of human buyers constrains the pricing behavior of a monopolist. … Käufern, da reale Käufer im Experiment das Preissetzungsverhalten des Monopolisten einschränken. …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009397109
We provide supporting evidence from the laboratory for the Nash predictions of the homogeneous-good Bertrand model under asymmetric constant unit costs.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011041816
The common prior assumption is pervasive in game-theoretic models with incomplete information. This paper investigates experimentally the importance of inducing a correct common prior in a two-person signaling game. Equilibrium selection arguments predict that different equilibria may be...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011049808