This paper studies sabotage in tournaments with at least three contestants, where the contestants know each other well …. Every contestant has an incentive to direct sabotage specifically against his most dangerous rival. In equilibrium … victims of mobbing are sometimes found to be overachieving. Further, sabotage equalizes promotion chances. The effect is most …

This paper studies sabotage in tournaments with at least three contestants, where the contestants know each other well …. Every contestant has an incentive to direct sabotage specifically against his most dangerous rival. In equilibrium … victims of mobbing are sometimes found to be overachieving. Further, sabotage equalizes promotion chances. The effect is most …

This paper studies sabotage in a dynamic tournament. Three players compete in two rounds. In the final round, a player …, if players are at the same position initially, they do not work productively or sabotage at all in the first round. Thus … sabotage is not only directly destructive, but also depresses incentives to work productively. If players are heterogeneous ex …

This paper studies sabotage in a dynamic tournament. Three players compete in two rounds. In the final round, a player …, if players are at the same position initially, they do not work productively or sabotage at all in the first round. Thus … sabotage is not only directly destructive, but also depresses incentives to work productively. If players are heterogeneous ex …

This paper studies sabotage in a dynamic tournament. Three players compete in two rounds. In the final round, a player …, if players are at the same position initially, they do not work productively or sabotage at all in the first round. Thus … sabotage is not only directly destructive, but also depresses incentives to work productively. If players are heterogeneous ex …

This paper studies sabotage in tournaments with at least three contestants, where the contestants know each other well …. Every contestant has an incentive to direct sabotage specifically against his most dangerous rival. In equilibrium … victims of mobbing are sometimes found to be overachieving. Further, sabotage equalizes promotion chances. The effect is most …

This paper studies sabotage in tournaments with at least three contestants, where the contestants know each other well …. Every contestant has an incentive to direct sabotage specifically against his most dangerous rival. In equilibrium … victims of mobbing are sometimes found to be overachieving. Further, sabotage equalizes promotion chances. The effect is most …

This paper studies sabotage in tournaments with at least three contestants, where the contestants know each other well …. Every contestant has an incentive to direct sabotage specifically against his most dangerous rival. In equilibrium … victims of mobbing are sometimes found to be overachieving. Further, sabotage equalizes promotion chances. The effect is most …