Showing 1 - 10 of 113
This paper analyzes the properties of runoff electoral systems when voters are strategic. A model of three-candidate runoff elections is presented, and two new features are included: the risk of upset victory in the second round is endogenous, and many types of runoff systems are considered....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010815595
Two parties choose redistricting plans to maximize their probability of winning a majority in the House of Representatives. In the unique equilibrium, parties maximally segregate their opponents' supporters but pool their own supporters into uniform districts. Ceteris paribus, the stronger party...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008645032
This paper presents an assignment model of CEOs and firms. The distributions of CEO pay levels and firms' market values are analyzed as the competitive equilibrium of a matching market where talents, as well as CEO positions, are scarce. It is shown how the observed joint distribution of CEO pay...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012721454
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005820836
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005571511
Due to betrayal aversion, people take risks less willingly when the agent of uncertainty is another person rather than nature. Individuals in six countries (Brazil, China, Oman, Switzerland, Turkey, and the United States) confronted a binary-choice trust game or a risky decision offering the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005237844
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005241655
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008596312
This paper reports the results of an experiment on exclusive contracts. We replicate the strategic environment described by Rasmusen, Ramseyer, and Wiley (1991) and Segal and Whinston (2000). Our findings are as follows. First, when the buyers can communicate, discrimination raises the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008596314
People exhibit peer-induced fairness concerns when they look to their peers as a reference to evaluate their endowments. We analyze two independent ultimatum games played sequentially by a leader and two followers. With peer-induced fairness, the second follower is averse to receiving less than...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008596319