Showing 1 - 10 of 97
In this paper we reply to Binmore and Shaked's criticism of the Fehr-Schmidt model of inequity aversion. We put the theory and their arguments into perspective and show that their criticism is not substantiated. Finally, we briefly comment on the main challenges for future research on social...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010333922
In this paper we reply to Binmore and Shaked's criticism of the Fehr-Schmidt model of inequity aversion. We put the theory and their arguments into perspective and show that their criticism is not substantiated. Finally, we briefly comment on the main challenges for future research on social...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003848846
The most fundamental solution concepts in Game Theory Nash equilibrium, backward induction, and iterated elimination of dominated strategies are based on the assumption that people are capable of predicting others' actions. These concepts require people to be able to view the game from the other...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010267443
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003768795
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003374126
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009407976
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010390850
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003213896
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003213912
The most fundamental solution concepts in Game Theory Nash equilibrium, backward induction, and iterated elimination of dominated strategies are based on the assumption that people are capable of predicting others' actions. These concepts require people to be able to view the game from the other...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003086457