Showing 1 - 7 of 7
penalty (to maintain adequate deterrence) with the lowest possible probability (to economize on costs of enforcement). We …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009293085
All models in Law and Economics use punishment functions (PF) that incorporates a trade-off between probability of detection, p, and punishment, F. Suppose society wishes to minimize the total costs of enforcement and damages from crime, T (p; F). For a given p, an optimal punishment function...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009293087
that it is optimal to impose the severest possible punishment (to maintain effective deterrence) at the lowest possible …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008457272
Tax evasion analysis is typically based on an expected utility theory (EUT) framework. However, this leads to several qualitative and quantitative puzzles. Given actual probabilities of audit and penalty rates the return on evasion ranges from 91-98 percent. So why don’t most of us evade?...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005422712
The predictions of expected utility theory (EUT) applied to tax evasion are flawed on two counts: (i) They are quantitatively in error by huge orders of magnitude. (ii) Higher taxation is predicted to lower evasion, which is at variance with the evidence. An emerging literature in behavioral...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005230636
attractive gamble to an expected utility maximizer. However, in practice, one observes too much compliance relative to the …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005230662
impose the severest possible punishment (to maintain effective deterrence) at the lowest possible probability (to economize …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005230665