Showing 1 - 10 of 27,846
This paper investigates how to test for nonresponse selection bias in wage functions induced by missing income information. We suggest an “easy-to-implement” approach which requires information on interviewer IDs and the interview date rather than hard-to-get interviewer characteristics.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011041633
This paper investigates how to test for nonresponse selection bias in wage functions induced by missing income information. We suggest an "easy-to-implement" approach which requires information on interviewer IDs and the interview date rather than hard to get interviewer characteristics.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011567541
This paper investigates how to test and correct for nonresponse selection bias induced by missing income information when estimating wage functions. The novelty is to use the variation in interviewer-specific response rates as exclusion restriction within the framework of a sample selection model.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010860281
This paper investigates how to test and correct for nonresponse selection bias induced by missing income information when estimating wage functions. The novelty is to use the variation in interviewer-specific response rates as exclusion restriction within the framework of a sample selection model.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010287357
The paper addresses two questions. First, is item nonresponse (INR) a precursor of panelattrition (UNR), as predicted by the theory of a latent cooperation continuum, or is theinterrelation of another type? Second, are the results in models of item nonresponse behavioraffected by a selectivity...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009025023
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009391257
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009391395
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009396376
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009396933
We develop and estimate a panel data model explaining the answers to questions about subjective probabilities, using data from the US Health and Retirement Study. We explicitly account for nonresponse, rounding, and focal point “50 percent” answers. Our results indicate that for three of the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008684816