A comment on W. Wei and M. Hansen's benefit estimation in "An aggregate demand model for air passenger traffic in the hub-and-spoke network"
This comment analyzes the demand model and method used by W. Wei and M. Hansen for computing the benefits of an airport capacity extension. The log-linear specification and coefficients of the demand function imply that the airport extension's positive effect on demand decreases with the volume of traffic and associated congestion. If this unlikely result is accepted, the surplus method used by Wei and Hansen underestimates the users' investment benefit. The note argues that the marginal willingness to pay for a capacity extension should rather increase with congestion. If this is the case, the method used by Wei and Hansen could actually overestimates the benefit. A better specification would rather allow for a function concave to the origin in order to account for capacity constraints, and also set a maximum finite price. Above all, a fair evaluation of the users' benefit should be based on a function which explicitly includes a variable, or function of variables, that permits an estimation of the users' cost of congestion.
Year of publication: |
2009
|
---|---|
Authors: | Beuthe, Michel |
Published in: |
Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. - Elsevier, ISSN 0965-8564. - Vol. 43.2009, 2, p. 230-234
|
Publisher: |
Elsevier |
Keywords: | Consumer surplus Investment benefits Airport capacity |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Intermodal freight transport in Europe
Beuthe, Michel, (2007)
-
Impacts on modal choices of new generation freights terminals
Jourquin, B., (1998)
-
Intermodality and substitution of modes for freight Transportation
Jourquin, Bart, (1999)
- More ...