An Empirical Analysis of No-Fault Insurance
A cross-sectional study of state loss experiences in 1977 were analyzed to test whether or not states that adopted no-fault automobile insurance laws experienced a reduction in deterrence. The results showed that pure no-fault states, mandatory no-fault states, and compulsory no-fault states experienced increases in their loss ratios of 7.449%, 6.308%, and 3.955%. respectively. Further analysis found that states that adopted no-fault insurance did not have significantly higher loss experiences before the adoption of such laws. Estimates of the cost savings from the adoption of no-fault insurance suggest annual benefits in the range of $28.8 million to $67 million. Employing these estimates to construct a benefit-cost ratio implies a ratio between 1.17 and 1.31. However, such estimates are subject to important qualifications and the conclusion that no-fault automobile insurance is economically efficient is tenuous, at best.
Year of publication: |
1982
|
---|---|
Authors: | Medoff, Marshall H. ; Magaddino, Joseph P. |
Published in: |
Evaluation Review. - Vol. 6.1982, 3, p. 373-392
|
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Suicides and Firearm Control Laws
Medoff, Marshall H., (1983)
-
Constituents' economic interests and senator support for spending limitations
Dennis, Christopher, (2008)
-
The input relationship between co-authors in economics : a production function approach
Medoff, Marshall H., (2007)
- More ...