An Improved Estimation of the Angstrom–Prescott Radiation Coefficients for the FAO56 Penman–Monteith Evapotranspiration Method

The FAO56 Penman–Monteith (FAO56-PM) method is known as the standard method for estimating reference evapotranspiration (ET<Subscript>0</Subscript>) in a variety of climate types. Global solar radiation (R<Subscript>s</Subscript>) is one of the essential inputs of this model, which is usually estimated from the Angstrom–Prescott (AP) method. The major drawback of the FAO56 pre-defined AP coefficients application is that the AP coefficients might need local calibration, to estimate ET<Subscript>0</Subscript> accurately. The aim of this study is to compare the effect of the FAO56 pre-defined AP coefficients (i.e. a and b) and the locally calibrated ones, on estimating daily ET<Subscript>0</Subscript> in 15 sites over Iran. Using long-term (1980–2007) experimental global solar radiation data (R<Subscript>s</Subscript>), new locally calibrated (a) and (b) coefficients are suggested and new ET<Subscript>0</Subscript> values are determined accordingly. It was found that the range of the calibrated AP coefficients (a, b) are climate dependent and locally different from those of recommended by the FAO56-PM method. Estimated ET<Subscript>0</Subscript> at daily scale, improved up to 72.7 % when the calibrated AP coefficients were applied instead of FAO56 pre-defined AP coefficients. Based on the results, applying the FAO56 pre-defined AP coefficients (i.e. a = 0.25 and b = 0.50) in northern subtropical-humid and southern hot climates caused larger ET<Subscript>0</Subscript> errors. By contrast, the least ET<Subscript>0</Subscript> errors were found in cool arid and cool semi-arid inland climates, locating about 1,330 above sea level. The correlations between the calibrated AP coefficients and geographical factors are also discussed in this research. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013