Cover Image

Arbitrage and Global Cones : Another Counterexample

Chichilnisky (1997) claims that another variant of her condition limiting arbitrage is necessary and sufficient for existence of equilibrium and nonemptiness of the core in an economy with short sales allowing half lines in indifference surfaces. Her proof, however, is based on a proposition purporting to relate her notion of "global cone" (see Chichilnisky (1997) for references) to the Page-Wooders "increasing cone." In this paper, we present a counterexample showing that parts (i) and (ii) of Chichilnisky's proposition are false. Thus, Chichilnisky's claimed result is without proof
Year of publication:
1999
Authors: Monteiro, Paulo Klinger ; Page, Frank H. ; Wooders, Myrna H.
Publisher: [S.l.] : SSRN
Subject: Neue politische Ökonomie | Public choice | Theorie | Theory | Arbitrage | Core
Description of contents: Abstract [papers.ssrn.com]
Check Google Scholar |
In German libraries (KVK)
I need help

Which error do you want to report?

Report: URL of this record is broken

Please note: Sometimes more than one URL is available for a resource. Please click on "More Options" to display these URLs

Report: Addition of an URL to that resource

Please note: Sometimes more than one URL is available for a resource. Please click on "More Options" to display these URLs

Report: The language(s) of that resource is/are…

Please note: Required language not in the list? Please use comment field

Report: Addition of an identifier to that resource

Report: report typo

Report: Add statement

Report: Add keywords

Please use the commentary box to describe other errors

Would you like to receive a feedback?

Please type the code from the image

For general questions please use this address.

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014202537
Similar items by subject
Similar items by person