Are Results from Non-hypothetical Choice-based Conjoint Analyses and Non-hypothetical Recoded-ranking Conjoint Analyses Similar?
Conflicting findings have been found in previous research that compared choice-based conjoint analysis and ranking conjoint analysis in a public good setting. The present paper revisits this issue for a private good in a non-hypothetical context using small and large choice sets. Our results suggest that in a small choice set setting, participants' preferences and willingness to pay are similar across the two conjoint analysis formats. However, in large choice sets, a divergence between the two conjoint analysis formats emerges. Hence, the two conjoint analysis formats can only be used interchangeably in small choice sets, not in large choice sets. Copyright 2013, Oxford University Press.
Year of publication: |
2013
|
---|---|
Authors: | Akaichi, Faical ; Nayga, Rodolfo M. ; Gil, José M. |
Published in: |
American Journal of Agricultural Economics. - Agricultural and Applied Economics Association - AAEA. - Vol. 95.2013, 4, p. 949-963
|
Publisher: |
Agricultural and Applied Economics Association - AAEA |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Demand reduction in multi-unit auctions with varying number of bidders and units
Akaichi, Faical, (2014)
-
Initial endowment effects in multi-unit vickrey auctions
Akaichi, Faical, (2012)
-
Akaichi, Faical, (2013)
- More ...