Asset Pricing Models: Implications for Expected Returns and Portfolio Selection.
When a risk factor is missing from an asset pricing model, the resulting mispricing is embedded within the residual covariance matrix. Exploiting this phenomenon leads to expected return estimates that are more stable and precise than estimates delivered by standard methods. Portfolio selection can also be improved. At an extreme, optimal portfolio weights are proportional to expected returns when no factors are observable. We find that such portfolios perform well in simulations and in out-of-sample comparisons. Article published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Financial Studies in its journal, The Review of Financial Studies.
Year of publication: |
2000
|
---|---|
Authors: | MacKinlay, A Craig ; Pastor, Lubos |
Published in: |
Review of Financial Studies. - Society for Financial Studies - SFS. - Vol. 13.2000, 4, p. 883-916
|
Publisher: |
Society for Financial Studies - SFS |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Data-Snooping Biases in Tests of Financial Asset Pricing Models.
Lo, Andrew W, (1990)
-
When Are Contrarian Profits Due to Stock Market Overreaction?
Lo, Andrew W, (1990)
-
Using Generalized Method of Moments to Test Mean-Variance Efficiency.
MacKinlay, A Craig, (1991)
- More ...