BAILOUTS IN FEDERATIONS: IS A HARD BUDGET CONSTRAINT ALWAYS BEST?
This article analyses hard and soft budget constraints in a federation, where there is a moral hazard problem between the central and the regional governments. Regional governments can avoid a bailout from the center by exerting costly effort. In this setting, a hard budget constraint is not always optimal because it can provide excessive incentives for high effort, and thus discourage investment that is socially efficient. Thus, a hard budget constraint can imply the opposite kind of inefficiency that emerges under a soft budget constraint, where the common pool problem can give rise to inefficiently low effort and overinvestment. Copyright ©2008 by the Economics Department Of The University Of Pennsylvania And Osaka University Institute Of Social And Economic Research Association.
Year of publication: |
2008
|
---|---|
Authors: | Besfamille, Martin ; Lockwood, Ben |
Published in: |
International Economic Review. - Department of Economics. - Vol. 49.2008, 2, p. 577-593
|
Publisher: |
Department of Economics |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Are Hard Budget Constraints for Sub-National Governments Always Efficient?
Besfamille, Martin, (2004)
-
BAILOUTS IN FEDERATIONS: IS A HARD BUDGET CONSTRAINT ALWAYS BEST?
Besfamille, Martin, (2008)
-
Are hard budget constraints for sub-national governments always efficient?
Besfamille, Martin, (2004)
- More ...