Comment on "Aligning the Interests of Lawyers and Clients"
Polinsky and Rubinfeld (2003) propose a novel system for eliminating the conflict of interest between lawyers and clients over how hard the lawyer should work on a given case. In their analysis of the system, however, Polinsky and Rubinfeld implicitly assume that the lawyer's marginal cost of effort is common knowledge. This comment shows that, when this assumption is relaxed, though their scheme does reduce the agency problem relative to the standard contingency fee arrangement, it no longer eliminates it. Copyright 2004, Oxford University Press.
Year of publication: |
2004
|
---|---|
Authors: | Wickelgren, Abraham L. |
Published in: |
American Law and Economics Review. - Oxford University Press. - Vol. 6.2004, 2, p. 434-439
|
Publisher: |
Oxford University Press |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Innovation, market structure and holdup problem with horizontal product differentiation
Wickelgren, Abraham L., (2000)
-
Moral hazard, mergers, and market power
Wickelgren, Abraham L., (2001)
-
Damages for breach of contract : should the government get special treatment?
Wickelgren, Abraham L., (2001)
- More ...