Competing Values in Public Management
<title>Abstract</title> The main objective of the article is to review relevant literature on (competing) public values in public management and to present a number of perspectives on how to deal with value conflicts in different administrative settings and contexts. We start this symposium with the assumption that value conflicts are prevalent, the public context can be characterized by value pluralism, and instrumental rationality does not seem to be the most useful to understand or improve value conflicts in public governance. This begs the question: what is the best way to study and manage value conflicts? The contributions to this symposium issue approach value conflicts in public governance from different perspectives, within different countries and different administrative and management systems, hoping to contribute to the debate on how to deal with important yet conflicting public values in public management, without pretending to offer a conclusive strategy or approach.This introductory article also presents and reviews the contributions to this symposium issue.
Year of publication: |
2011
|
---|---|
Authors: | Wal, Zeger van der ; Graaf, Gjalt de ; Lawton, Alan |
Published in: |
Public Management Review. - Taylor & Francis Journals, ISSN 1471-9037. - Vol. 13.2011, 3, p. 331-341
|
Publisher: |
Taylor & Francis Journals |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Editorial: Competing values in public management : introduction to the symposium issue
Wal, Zeger van der, (2011)
-
Exel, Job van, (2007)
-
What works : the role of confidential integrity advisors and effective whistleblowing
Graaf, Gjalt de, (2019)
- More ...