Type of publication: | Other |
---|---|
Language: | English |
Notes: | Kiley Robert. Does the internet harm health? Some evidence exists that the internet does harm health. BMJ Jan 26, 2002. Vol. 324(7331) p. 238-9. Research Unit for Cybermedicine & E-health, Department of Clinical Social Medicine, University of Heidelberg. Database of Adverse Events Related to the Internet (DAERI). URL: http://www.medcertain.org/daeri/ [accessed 2003 Oct 3] Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century National Academies Press; Washington, DC. Jun 1, 2001. URL: http://www.nap.edu/books/0309072808/html/ Shepperd Sasha, Charnock Deborah. Against internet exceptionalism. BMJ Mar 9, 2002. Vol. 324(7337) p. 556-7. URL: http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/324/7337/556 Purcell Gretchen P, Wilson Petra, Delamothe Tony. The quality of health information on the internet. BMJ Mar 9, 2002. Vol. 324(7337) p. 557-8. URL: http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/324/7337/557 Berland G K, Elliott M N, Morales L S, Algazy J I, Kravitz R L, Broder M S, Kanouse D E, Muñoz J A, Puyol J A, Lara M, Watkins K E, Yang H, Mcglynn E A. Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. JAMA May 23, 2001. Vol. 285(20) p. 2612-21. Impicciatore P, Pandolfini C, Casella N, Bonati M. Reliability of health information for the public on the World Wide Web: systematic survey of advice on managing fever in children at home. BMJ Jun 28, 1997. Vol. 314(7098) p. 1875-9. URL: http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/314/7098/1875 Pandolfini Chiara, Bonati Maurizio. Follow up of quality of public oriented health information on the world wide web: systematic re-evaluation. BMJ Mar 9, 2002. Vol. 324(7337) p. 582-3. URL: http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/324/7337/582 Hatfield C L, May S K, Markoff J S. Quality of consumer drug information provided by four Web sites. Am J Health Syst Pharm Nov 15, 1999. Vol. 56(22) p. 2308-11. Culver J D, Gerr F, Frumkin H. Medical information on the Internet: a study of an electronic bulletin board. J Gen Intern Med Aug 1997. Vol. 12(8) p. 466-70. Meric Funda, Bernstam Elmer V, Mirza Nadeem Q, Hunt Kelly K, Ames Frederick C, Ross Merrick I, Kuerer Henry M, Pollock Raphael E, Musen Mark A, Singletary S Eva. Breast cancer on the world wide web: cross sectional survey of quality of information and popularity of websites. BMJ Mar 9, 2002. Vol. 324(7337) p. 577-81. URL: http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/324/7337/577 Eysenbach Gunther, Powell John, Kuss Oliver, Sa Eun-Ryoung. Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review. JAMA May 22, 2002. Vol. 287(20) p. 2691-700. Wyatt J C. Commentary: measuring quality and impact of the World Wide Web. BMJ Jun 28, 1997. Vol. 314(7098) p. 1879-81. Eysenbach G, Diepgen T L. Towards quality management of medical information on the internet: evaluation, labelling, and filtering of information. BMJ Nov 28, 1998. Vol. 317(7171) p. 1496-500. URL: http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/317/7171/1496 Joubert M, Aymard S, Fieschi D, Fieschi M. Quality criteria and access characteristics of Web sites: proposal for the design of a health Internet directory. Proc AMIA Symp 1999. p. 824-828. Jones J. Development of a self-assessment method for patients to evaluate health information on the Internet. Proc AMIA Symp 1999. p. 540-544. Teach L. Evaluating health-related Web sites. URL: http://www.sph.emory.edu/WELLNESS/abstract.html [accessed 2000 Apr 2] Spence WC. The librarian as Webliographer: finding, evaluating, and using health sciences resources on the Internet. URL: http://www.umdnj.edu/~spence/metro/evaluate.htm [accessed 2000 Apr 2] Coutts HT. Critical evaluation of resources on the Internet. URL: http://www.library.ualberta.ca/library_html/help/pathfinders/qual.html [accessed 2000 Apr 2] Wilkinson GL, Bennett LT, Oliver KM. Evaluating the quality of Internet information sources: consolidated listing of evaluation criteria and quality indicators. URL: http://itech1.coe.uga.edu/Faculty/gwilkinson/criteria.html [accessed 2000 Apr 2] Testa J. Current Web contents: developing Web site selection criteria. URL: http://www.isinet.com/hot/essays/23.html [accessed 2000 Apr 2] Price S L, Hersh W R. Filtering Web pages for quality indicators: an empirical approach to finding high quality consumer health information on the World Wide Web. Proc AMIA Symp 1999. p. 911-5. URL: http://www.amia.org/pubs/symposia/D005524.PDF Shon J, Musen M A. The low availability of metadata elements for evaluating the quality of medical information on the World Wide Web. Proc AMIA Symp 1999. p. 945-9. URL: http://www.amia.org/pubs/symposia/D005476.PDF Eysenbach G. 1st progress report MedCERTAIN project. Vol 1: quality of health information on the Web, version 1.8 [extract]. University of Heidelberg; Heidelberg. 2001. URL: http://www.medcertain.org/metadata/progress-report1-7-medpics.pdf Eysenbach Gunther, Köhler Christian. How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews. BMJ Mar 9, 2002. Vol. 324(7337) p. 573-7. URL: http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/324/7337/573 Roter D L, Hall J A. Health education theory: an application to the process of patient-provider communication. Health Educ Res Jun 1991. Vol. 6(2) p. 185-93. Bertakis K D, Roter D, Putnam S M. The relationship of physician medical interview style to patient satisfaction. J Fam Pract Feb 1991. Vol. 32(2) p. 175-81. Lohr K N, Grossman J H, Cassel C K. From the Institute of Medicine. JAMA Oct 27, 1993. Vol. 270(16) p. 1911. Donabedian A. The quality of care. How can it be assessed?. JAMA Sep 23, 1988. Vol. 260(12) p. 1743-8. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO). Home page. URL: http://www.jcaho.org/ [accessed 2003 Nov 17] National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA). Home page. URL: http://www.ncqa.org/index.asp [accessed 2003 Nov 17] Utilization Review Accreditation Commission (URAC). Home page. URL: http://urac.org/ [accessed 2003 Nov 17] National Committee for Quality Assurance. Health plan data and information set, 2001 National Committee for Quality Assurance; Washington, DC. 2001. Lohr K N. Outcome measurement: concepts and questions. Inquiry 1988. Vol. 25(1) p. 37-50. Rubin H R, Pronovost P, Diette G B. The advantages and disadvantages of process-based measures of health care quality. Int J Qual Health Care Dec 2001. Vol. 13(6) p. 469-74. URL: http://intqhc.oupjournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=reprint&pmid=11769749 National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA). Cholesterol management screening and control. URL: http://www.ncqa.org/somc2001/cholesterol/somc_2001_chm.html [accessed 2003 Nov 17] Donabedian A. The role of outcomes in quality assessment and assurance. QRB Qual Rev Bull Nov 1992. Vol. 18(11) p. 356-60. Gibson P G, Coughlan J, Wilson A J, Abramson M, Bauman A, Hensley M J, Walters E H. Self-management education and regular practitioner review for adults with asthma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000. (2) p. CD001117. Kelly C S, Morrow A L, Shults J, Nakas N, Strope G L, Adelman R D. Outcomes evaluation of a comprehensive intervention program for asthmatic children enrolled in medicaid. Pediatrics May 2000. Vol. 105(5) p. 1029-35. URL: http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=10790458 Gibson P G, Coughlan J, Abramson M. Self-management education for adults with asthma improves health outcomes. West J Med May 1999. Vol. 170(5) p. 266. URL: http://www.ewjm.com/cgi/reprint/170/5/266.pdf Hopman W M, Owen J G, Gagne E. Assessment of the effect of asthma education on outcomes. Manag Care Interface May 1999. Vol. 12(5) p. 89-93. Forshee J D, Whalen E B, Hackel R, Butt L T, Smeltzer P A, Martin J, Lavin P T, Buchner D A. The effectiveness of one-on-one nurse education on the outcomes of high-risk adult and pediatric patients with asthma. Manag Care Interface Dec 1998. Vol. 11(12) p. 82-92. Piette J D, Weinberger M, Mcphee S J. The effect of automated calls with telephone nurse follow-up on patient-centered outcomes of diabetes care: a randomized, controlled trial. Med Care Feb 2000. Vol. 38(2) p. 218-30. Tilly K F, Belton A B, Mclachlan J F. Continuous monitoring of health status outcomes: experience with a diabetes education program. Diabetes Educ 1995. Vol. 21(5) p. 413-9. Moore S M. The effects of a discharge information intervention on recovery outcomes following coronary artery bypass surgery. Int J Nurs Stud Apr 1996. Vol. 33(2) p. 181-9. Jadad A R, Gagliardi A. Rating health information on the Internet: navigating to knowledge or to Babel?. JAMA Feb 25, 1998. Vol. 279(8) p. 611-4. Gagliardi Anna, Jadad Alejandro R. Examination of instruments used to rate quality of health information on the internet: chronicle of a voyage with an unclear destination. BMJ Mar 9, 2002. Vol. 324(7337) p. 569-73. URL: http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/324/7337/569 Wilson Petra. How to find the good and avoid the bad or ugly: a short guide to tools for rating quality of health information on the internet. BMJ Mar 9, 2002. Vol. 324(7337) p. 598-602. URL: http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/324/7337/598 Boyer C, Selby M, Scherrer J R, Appel R D. The Health On the Net Code of Conduct for medical and health Websites. Comput Biol Med Sep 1998. Vol. 28(5) p. 603-10. Hi-Ethics. Home page. URL: http://www.hi-ethics.org/ [accessed 2003 Nov 17] URAC. Health Web site standards: version 1.0. 2001. URL: http://webapps.urac.org/websiteaccreditation/Portal/Business/Docs/web%20site%20stds%20v1-0.doc [accessed 2003 Oct 3] Fox S, Rainie L. Vital decisions: how Internet users decided what information to trust when they or their loved ones are sick. Pew Internet & American Life Project; Washington, DC. May 22, 2002. URL: http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/pdfs/PIP_Vital_Decisions_May2002.pdf Shannon Claude E, Weaver Warren. Mathematical Theory of Communication University of Illinois Press; Urbana, IL. Oct 1, 1963. |
Other identifiers: | 10.2196/jmir.5.4.e29 [DOI] |
Source: | BASE |
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009455224