Correcting for Random Budgets in Revealed Preference Experiments

Experiments on revealed preference often use budget sets for participants that are randomly and independently drawn according to some criteria. However, this means that the budgets and choices of different individuals are not immediately comparable. This paper proposes a method to control for these differences. In particular, we control for the “power” of different budget sets by examining the consistency of an individual’s choices relative to some simulated baseline behavior conditional on budgets faced by the individual. We apply this methodology to two existing experimental datasets. Our results show that failure to account for this variation results in a bias when looking directly at measures of choice consistency and the sign of this bias depends on the measure being used. However, controlling for this variation does not change the correlation between measures of choice consistency and observable demographic characteristics like income and education