Defining benefit catalogues and entitlements to health care in Germany: Decision makers, decision criteria and taxonomy of catalogues
This paper studies the politico-economic reasons for the refusal of a proposed compulsory flood insurance scheme in Germany. It provides the rationale for such scheme and outlines the basic features of a market-orientated design. The main reasons for the political down-turn of this proposal were the (mis)perceived costs of a state guarantee, legal objections against a compulsory insurance, distributional conflicts between the federal government and the German states ("Länder") on the implied administrative costs and the well-known "samariter dilemma" of ad-hoc disaster relief. The focus on pure market solutions proved to be an ineffective strategy for policy advice in this field.
Year of publication: |
2005
|
---|---|
Authors: | Busse, Reinhard ; Stargardt, Tom ; Schreyögg, Jonas ; Simon, Claudia ; Martin, Maria |
Publisher: |
Berlin : Technische Universität Berlin, Fakultät Wirtschaft und Management |
Subject: | Gesetzliche Krankenversicherung | Selbstverwaltung | Gesundheitskosten | Deutschland |
Saved in:
Series: | Diskussionspapier ; 2005/5 |
---|---|
Type of publication: | Book / Working Paper |
Type of publication (narrower categories): | Working Paper |
Language: | English |
Other identifiers: | 687050235 [GVK] hdl:10419/36448 [Handle] RePEc:zbw:tubsem:20055 [RePEc] |
Source: |
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010300572