Discussion of: "Acquisition profitability and timely loss recognition" by J. Francis and X. Martin
Francis and Martin (2009) test whether accounting conservatism induces managers to make better acquisition decisions. This discussion highlights three main issues. First, the hypothesized links between conservatism and future investments are potentially incomplete. In particular, the possibility that conservatism can have dysfunctional outcomes if acquisition decisions are based on anticipated earnings effects is ignored. Second, the evidence is insufficient to infer a causal relation between conservatism and acquisition profitability. Third, the hypothesis development fails to indicate whether timely loss recognition or the asymmetric timeliness of loss versus gain recognition is the more appropriate measure of conservatism given the context.
Year of publication: |
2010
|
---|---|
Authors: | Roychowdhury, Sugata |
Published in: |
Journal of Accounting and Economics. - Elsevier, ISSN 0165-4101. - Vol. 49.2010, 1-2, p. 179-183
|
Publisher: |
Elsevier |
Keywords: | Acquisition Conservatism FASB SEC Announcement returns |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Discussion of "The numbers game in the pre- and post-Sarbanes-Oxley eras"
Roychowdhury, Sugata, (2009)
-
Earnings management through real activities manipulation
Roychowdhury, Sugata, (2006)
-
Discussion of : "Acquisition profitability and timely loss recognition" by J. Francis and X. Martin
Roychowdhury, Sugata, (2010)
- More ...