Do house prices reflect fundamentals? Aggregate and panel data evidence
We investigate whether recently high and consequently rapidly decreasing U.S. house prices have been justified by fundamental factors such as personal income, population, house rent, stock market wealth, building costs, and mortgage rate. We first conduct the standard unit root and cointegration tests with aggregate data. Nationwide analysis potentially suffers from problems of the low power of stationarity tests and the ignorance of dependence among regional house markets. Therefore, we also employ panel data stationarity tests which are robust to cross-sectional dependence. Contrary to previous panel studies of the U.S. housing market, we consider several, not just one, fundamental factors. Our results confirm that panel data unit root tests have greater power as compared with univariate tests. However, the overall conclusions are the same for both methodologies. The house price does not align with the fundamentals in sub-samples prior to 1996 and from 1997 to 2006. It appears that the real estate prices take long swings from their fundamental value and it can take decades before they revert to it. The most recent correction (a collapsed bubble) occurred around 2006.
Year of publication: |
2009
|
---|---|
Authors: | Mikhed, Vyacheslav ; ZemcĂk, Petr |
Published in: |
Journal of Housing Economics. - Elsevier, ISSN 1051-1377. - Vol. 18.2009, 2, p. 140-149
|
Publisher: |
Elsevier |
Keywords: | C33 G12 R21 R31 Panel data House prices Cointegration Fundamentals Bubble |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Who's afraid of reduced-rank parameterizations of multivariate models? Theory and example
Gilbert, Scott, (2006)
-
Testing for Latent Factors in Models with Autocorrelation and Heteroskedasticity of Unknown Form
Gilbert, Scott, (2005)
-
Testing for Bubbles in Housing Markets: A Panel Data Approach
Zemcik, Petr, (2007)
- More ...