Do Option Strategy Traders Have a Disadvantage? Evidence from the Australian Options Market
<section xml:id="fut21634-sec-0001"> This study measures the magnitude of execution costs of outright options and options which constitute strategies (“strategy‐linked options”), and examines if any differences in execution costs between these two groups is attributable to differences in market making costs on the Australian Options Market. Results reveal that execution costs for tailor‐made strategy‐linked options are greater than outright options. Also, this study provides evidence that the disadvantage of tailor‐made strategy‐linked options over outright options is driven by market makers' hedging costs. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Jrl Fut Mark 34:838–852, 2014 </section>
Year of publication: |
2014
|
---|---|
Authors: | Flint, Anthony ; Lepone, Andrew ; Yang, Jin Young |
Published in: |
Journal of Futures Markets. - John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.. - Vol. 34.2014, 9, p. 838-852
|
Publisher: |
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Do options strategy traders have a disadvantage? : evidence from the Australian options market
Flint, Anthony, (2014)
-
Do Option Strategy Traders Have a Disadvantage? Evidence from the Australian Options Market
Yang, Jin Young, (2015)
-
The impact of a pro-rata algorithm on liquidity : evidence from the NYSE LIFFE
Lepone, Andrew, (2012)
- More ...