Do people think about absolute or relative price differences when choosing between substitute goods?
The article presents experimental evidence that shows that people often consider relative price differences in addition to absolute differences when choosing between substitute goods. Because the choice between substitute goods is a very common one, this is an important finding. The experiment uses scenarios in various consumption categories: hotel rooms, flights, and books. Subjects were either students or participants in an economics conference. The data allow to reject the hypothesis that people think only about relative price differences in favor of the hypothesis that people think about both relative and absolute price differences. Whether the price given to the subjects is that of the high-quality good or of the low-quality good makes a large difference, a result that is related to the endowment effect and the status quo bias. Implications of the results for business strategy and other areas are also discussed.
Year of publication: |
2011
|
---|---|
Authors: | Azar, Ofer H. |
Published in: |
Journal of Economic Psychology. - Elsevier, ISSN 0167-4870. - Vol. 32.2011, 3, p. 450-457
|
Publisher: |
Elsevier |
Keywords: | Consumer behavior Product differentiation Loss aversion Behavioral decision making |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
The impact of tipping on firm strategy and market outcomes
Azar, Ofer H., (2008)
-
Strategic behavior and social norms in tipped service industries
Azar, Ofer H., (2008)
-
The implications of tipping for economics and management
Azar, Ofer H., (2003)
- More ...