Dynamic Asymptotically Ideal Models and Finite Approximation.
The authors extend W. A. Barnett and A. Jonas's (1983) asymptotically ideal model (AIM) to model for the possibility that the data were generated by a dynamic process. Prediction errors for dynamic and static AIM models are compared for various simulated datasets. Monetary data are also used to evaluate the AIM specifications. There is substantial evidence that an AR(1) correction considerably improves the quality of low-order finite approximations of AIM with the cost of estimating only one additional parameter. Furthermore, restricting a dynamic AIM to approximate only linear homogenous functions often results in severe misspecification.
Year of publication: |
1997
|
---|---|
Authors: | Fleissig, Adrian R ; Swofford, James L |
Published in: |
Journal of Business & Economic Statistics. - American Statistical Association. - Vol. 15.1997, 4, p. 482-92
|
Publisher: |
American Statistical Association |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
A New PC-Based Test for Varian's Weak Separability Conditions.
Fleissig, Adrian R, (2003)
-
The Dynamic Laurent Flexible Form and the Demand for Money.
Fleissig, Adrian R, (1997)
-
Fleissig, Adrian R, (1997)
- More ...