EARLY DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS DEBATES REVISITED
<italic>Development economics in its early years created the image of a fierce fight between advocates of contrasting theories or approaches—“balanced growth” vs. “unbalanced growth,” or “program loans” vs. “project loans.” This view has the merit of highlighting such conflicts in great detail; yet, it fails to take into account the reality of development economics as it was practiced in the field. This paper reassesses these old conflicts by complementing the traditional focus on theoretical debates with an emphasis on the practice of development economics.</italic>
Year of publication: |
2011
|
---|---|
Authors: | ALACEVICH, MICHELE |
Published in: |
Journal of the History of Economic Thought. - Cambridge University Press. - Vol. 33.2011, 02, p. 145-171
|
Publisher: |
Cambridge University Press |
Description of contents: | Abstract [journals.cambridge.org] |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Alacevich, Michele, (2012)
-
The World Bank's Early Reflections On Development : A Development Institution Or A Bank?
Alacevich, Michele, (2008)
-
Early Development Economics Debates Revisited
Alacevich, Michele, (2008)
- More ...