Evaluating universities using simple scientometric research-output metrics: Total citation counts per university for a retrospective seven-year rolling sample
We advocate a scientometric, top-down and institution-based research-assessment methodology that is based on total citations accumulated from all publications associated with a specific university during the survey period. The exercise could be done every year using a rolling seven-year retrospective sample and should be performed by at least two independent auditors. Identification of elite ‘revolutionary-science’ institutions could be accomplished using a metric derived from the distribution of science Nobel Prizes. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.
Year of publication: |
2007
|
---|---|
Authors: | Charlton, Bruce G ; Andras, Peter |
Published in: |
Science and Public Policy. - Oxford University Press, ISSN 0302-3427. - Vol. 34.2007, 8, p. 555-563
|
Publisher: |
Oxford University Press |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Why are top universities losing their lead? An economics modelling-based approach
Andras, Peter, (2009)
-
Uncertainty and Cooperation: Analytical Results and a Simulated Agent Society
Andras, Peter, (2005)
-
Research: metrics, quality, and management implications
Andras, Peter, (2011)
- More ...