FINDING VALUE WHERE NONE EXISTS: PITFALLS IN USING ADJUSTED PRESENT VALUE
There are several conceptually "correct" methods for valuing firms and projects, including the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) approach, the flows to equity (FTE) method, and the adjusted present value (APV) or valuation-by-components method. The author examines the relative advantages of these frameworks and offers guidance as to when they are likely to be most useful. The key message is a caution to would-be users of APV: it is frequently unreliable and should be used only in conjunction with more conventional valuation frameworks. It works best in transactions that involve structured financings, such as leveraged buyouts and project and real estate financings. Even in these cases, however, its usefulness depends on theoretical concepts that in practical applications have a wide margin of error. 2002 Morgan Stanley.
Year of publication: |
2002
|
---|---|
Authors: | Booth, Laurence |
Published in: |
Journal of Applied Corporate Finance. - Morgan Stanley, ISSN 1078-1196. - Vol. 15.2002, 1, p. 95-104
|
Publisher: |
Morgan Stanley |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
The dividend tax credit and Canadian ownership objectives
Booth, Laurence D., (1987)
-
A note on adjustment to production uncertainty and the theory of the firm
Booth, Laurence D., (1990)
-
The influence of production technology on risk and the cost of capital
Booth, Laurence D., (1991)
- More ...