Fit of different models for multitrait-multimethod experiments

In the past, several models have been developed for the estimation of the reliability and validity of measurement instruments from multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) experiments. Suggestions have been made for additive, multiplicative and correlated uniqueness models, whereas recently Coenders and Saris (2000) suggested a procedure to test these models against one another. In this article, the different models suggested for the analysis of MTMM matrixes have been compared for their fit to 87 data sets collected in the United States (Andrews, 1984; Rodgers, Andrews, & Herzog, 1992), Austria (Koltringer, 1995), and the Netherlands (Scherpenzeel & Saris, 1997). As most variables are categorical, the analysis has been carried out on the basis of polychoric-polyserial correlation coefficients and of Pearson correlations. The fit of the models based on polychoric correlations is much worse than the fit of models based on product moment correlations, but in both cases a model that assumes additive method effects fits most data sets better than the other models, including the so-called multiplicative models.