Fixed and Sunk Costs Revisited
<title>Abstract</title> The authors attempt to clarify the concepts of, and the link between, fixed costs and sunk costs. They argue that the root for possible confusion between fixed costs and sunk costs is the inconsistency in defining the term fixed costs. They define <italic>fixed costs</italic> uniformly as the costs that are independent of the level of output and suggest that instructors refer to the part of fixed costs that are irrevocably committed as <italic>sunk costs</italic>. Under these definitions, the statement “there are no long-run fixed costs” is incorrect. Instructors should teach students that in the long run there are no sunk costs, although there may easily be fixed costs.
Year of publication: |
2001
|
---|---|
Authors: | Wang, X. Henry ; Yang, Bill Z. |
Published in: |
The Journal of Economic Education. - Taylor & Francis Journals, ISSN 0022-0485. - Vol. 32.2001, 2, p. 178-185
|
Publisher: |
Taylor & Francis Journals |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Mixed-strategy equilibria in a quality differentiation model
Wang, X. Henry, (2001)
-
Fixed and Sunk Costs Revisited
Wang, X. Henry, (2001)
-
On the Treatment of Fixed and Sunk Costs in Principles Textbooks: A Comment and a Reply
Wang, X. Henry, (2004)
- More ...