Fundamental and technical analysis: substitutes or complements?
Although the fundamental and technical analysis literatures invest considerable effort in assessing their respective ability to explain share prices, they invariably do so without reference to each other. In this context, we propose an equity valuation model integrating both fundamental and technical analysis and, in doing so, recognize their potential as complements rather than as substitutes. Testing confirms the complementary nature of fundamental and technical analysis by showing that, although each performs well in isolation, models integrating both have superior explanatory power. While our findings relate to the valuation of shares, they also have implications for other valuation exercises. Copyright (c) The Authors. Journal compilation (c) 2009 AFAANZ.
Year of publication: |
2009
|
---|---|
Authors: | Bettman, Jenni L. ; Sault, Stephen J. ; Schultz, Emma L. |
Published in: |
Accounting and Finance. - Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand - AFAANZ, ISSN 0810-5391. - Vol. 49.2009, 1, p. 21-36
|
Publisher: |
Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand - AFAANZ |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Fundamental and technical analysis : substitutes or complements?
Bettman, Jenni L., (2009)
-
Momentum profits in the Australian equity market: A matched firm approach
Bettman, Jenni L., (2009)
-
Momentum profits in the Australian equity market: A matched firm approach
Bettman, Jenni L., (2009)
- More ...