Gatekeeping versus direct-access when patient information matters
We develop a principal-agent model in which the health authority acts as a principal for both a patient and a general practitioner (GP). The goal of the paper is to weigh the merits of gatekeeping versus non-gatekeeping approaches to health care when patient self-health information and patient pressure on GPs to provide referrals for specialized care are considered. We find that, when GPs incentives matter, a non-gatekeeping system is preferable only when (i) patient pressure to refer is sufficiently high and (ii) the quality of the patient's self-health information is neither highly inaccurate (in which case the patient's self-referral will be very inefficient) nor highly accurate (in which case the GP's agency problem will be very costly). Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Year of publication: |
2010
|
---|---|
Authors: | González, Paula |
Published in: |
Health Economics. - John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., ISSN 1057-9230. - Vol. 19.2010, 6, p. 730-754
|
Publisher: |
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Policy implications of transferring patients to private practice
González, Paula, (2002)
-
On the design of equity-oriented pharmaceutical copayments
González, Paula, (2020)
-
Gatekeeping versus direct-access when patient information matters
González, Paula, (2010)
- More ...