Harmonization and Side Payments in Political Cooperation
For two districts or countries that try to internalize externalities, I analyze a bargaining game under private information. I derive conditions for when it is efficient with uniform policies across regions—with and without side payments— and when it is efficient to prohibit side payments in the negotiations. While policy differentiation and side payments allow the policy to better reflect local conditions, they create conflicts between the regions and, thus, delay. The results also describe when political centralization outperforms decentralized cooperation, and they provide a theoretical foundation for the controversial "uniformity assumption" traditionally used by the fiscal federalism literature. (JEL C78, D72, D82, H77)
Year of publication: |
2007
|
---|---|
Authors: | Harstad, Bård |
Published in: |
American Economic Review. - American Economic Association - AEA. - Vol. 97.2007, 3, p. 871-889
|
Publisher: |
American Economic Association - AEA |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Private politics and public regulation
Egorov, Georgy, (2015)
-
Compliance Technology and Self-Enforcing Agreements
Harstad, Bård, (2015)
-
Buy coal! Deposit markets prevent carbon leakage
Harstad, Bård, (2010)
- More ...